資料詳細

  • 1 件中、 1 件目

[ 洋図書 ] The other Australia/Japan living marine resources dispute : inferences on the merits of the southern bluefin tuna arbitration in light of the whaling case / ( Brill research perspectives )

by Andrew Serdy. -- Brill, -- c2017. --

所蔵

所蔵は 1 件です。

所蔵館 所蔵場所 資料区分 請求記号 資料コード 所蔵状態 資料の利用
配架日 協力貸出 利用状況 返却予定日 資料取扱 予約数 付録注記 備考
中央 1F法律 一般洋図書 F/329.2/S48/O 7108993673 配架図 Digital BookShelf
2017/08/15 可能 利用可   0

Eメールによる郵送複写申込みは、「東京都在住」の登録利用者の方が対象です。

    • 統合検索
      都内図書館の所蔵を
      横断検索します。       類似資料 AI Shelf
      この資料に類似した資料を
      AIが紹介します。

ページの先頭へ

資料詳細 閉じる

ISBN 9004339442 (paperback)
ISBN13桁 9789004339446 (paperback)
テキストの言語 英語                  
分類：NDC10版 329.269
個人著者標目 Serdy, Andrew.
本タイトル The other Australia/Japan living marine resources dispute :
タイトル関連情報 inferences on the merits of the southern bluefin tuna arbitration in light of the whaling case /
著者名 by Andrew Serdy.
出版地・頒布地 Leiden ;
出版者・頒布者名 Brill,
出版年・頒布年 c2017.
数量 vi, 91 pages :
他の形態的事項 illustration ;
大きさ 24 cm.
書誌注記 Includes bibliographical references.
内容注記 Introduction -- The whaling case judgment -- Southern bluefin : the fish -- Historical overview of the Japanese SBT fishery -- First interactions -- The state of the stock -- The first quotas and their subsequent reduction -- Gestation of the dispute : interpretation of CPUE -- Impasse in the in the CCBST -- Japan's experimental fishing -- The relevant law identified in the statments of claim -- The ITLOS hearing and order -- The parties' arguments before the Annex VII Arbitral Tribunal -- The Annex VII Arbitral Tribunal award on jurisdiction -- Resolution of the dispute -- Issues left unresolved because the case did not go to the merits -- Concluding observations.
要約、抄録、注釈等 In 2000, the case brought by Australia and New Zealand against Japan's unilateral experimental fishing programme for southern bluefin tuna controversially failed to reach the merits for lack of the arbitral tribunal's jurisdiction. It was widely supposed that it would ultimately have failed anyway because of international courts' reluctance to consider scientific matters, the dispute's underlying cause being the parties' scientific disagreements regarding both the tuna stock itself and the nature and risks of the experiment. In 2014, however, the ICJ decided in Australia's favour the case against Japan's scientific whaling, based on flaws in the design of that experiment. Reviewing the tuna experiment's evolving design, the propositions it was to (dis)prove and the use Japan intended for that proof, Andrew Serdy suggests that similar factors were at play in both disputes and that a similar outcome of the tuna case, though not inevitable, would have been amply justified -- Back cover.
統一タイトル(シリーズ副出標目) Brill research perspectives.
シリーズ名・巻次 Brill research perspectives 
一般件名 Law of the sea.
Marine resources conservation -- Law and legislation -- Japan.
地名件名 Australia.
Japan.
資料情報1 『The other Australia/Japan living marine resources dispute : inferences on the merits of the southern bluefin tuna arbitration in light of the whaling case /』（Brill research perspectives）　by Andrew Serdy.　Brill,　c2017. （所蔵館：中央　 請求記号：F/329.2/S48/O　 資料コード：7108993673）
URL https://catalog.library.metro.tokyo.lg.jp/winj/opac/switch-detail.do?lang=ja&bibid=1352025897

ページの先頭へ