Peter Kirwan. -- Cambridge University Press, -- 2015. --

所蔵

所蔵は 1 件です。

所蔵館 所蔵場所 資料区分 請求記号 資料コード 所蔵状態 資料の利用
配架日 協力貸出 利用状況 返却予定日 資料取扱 予約数 付録注記 備考
中央 3階C海外文学 一般洋図書 F/932.5/S52/S65 7114781603 配架図 Digital BookShelf
2022/04/20 可能 利用可   0

Eメールによる郵送複写申込みは、「東京都在住」の登録利用者の方が対象です。

    • 統合検索
      都内図書館の所蔵を
      横断検索します。
      類似資料 AI Shelf
      この資料に類似した資料を
      AIが紹介します。

資料詳細 閉じる

ISBN 1107096170 (hardcover)
ISBN13桁 9781107096172 (hardcover)
無効なISBN等 9781316310557 (PDF ebook)
テキストの言語 英語                  
分類:NDC10版 932.5
個人著者標目 Kirwan, Peter.
本タイトル Shakespeare and the idea of Apocrypha :
タイトル関連情報 negotiating the boundaries of the dramatic canon /
著者名 Peter Kirwan.
出版地・頒布地 Cambridge, United Kingdom :
出版者・頒布者名 Cambridge University Press,
出版年・頒布年 2015.
数量 xii, 258 pages :
他の形態的事項 illustrations ;
大きさ 24 cm
書誌注記 Includes bibliographical references (pages 230-252) and index.
内容注記 Introduction: the idea of Apocrypha -- Canonising the Apocrypha -- The Apocrypha in rep -- Defining 'Shakespeare' -- Apocryphising the canon -- Epilogue: an apocryphal identity -- Appendix -- Works cited -- Index.
要約、抄録、注釈等 "In addition to the thirty-six plays of the First Folio, some eighty plays have been attributed in whole or part to William Shakespeare, yet most are rarely read, performed or discussed. This book, the first to confront the implications of the 'Shakespeare Apocrypha', asks how and why these plays have historically been excluded from the canon. Innovatively combining approaches from book history, theatre history, attribution studies and canon theory, Peter Kirwan unveils the historical assumptions and principles that shaped the construction of the Shakespeare canon. Case studies treat plays such as Sir Thomas More, Edward III, Arden of Faversham, Mucedorus, Double Falsehood and A Yorkshire Tragedy, showing how the plays' contested 'Shakespearean' status has shaped their fortunes. Kirwan's book rethinks the impact of authorial canons on the treatment of anonymous and disputed plays"--Provided by publisher.,"The Idea of Apocrypha All held Apocrypha, not worth survey. Falsehoods On 2 April 1796, London's Drury Lane Theatre presented a recently unearthed play by William Shakespeare. Vortigern and Rowena, 'discovered' by William Henry Ireland, played to a derisive crowd, whose disbelief in the play's authenticity was shared by the theatre's manager, John Philip Kemble. Kemble, in the lead role, pointedly repeated the line 'and when this solemn mock'ry is ended', inviting ridicule from the crowd. The production was not revived, and the whole incident contributed to the unravelling of Ireland's claims. The authenticity of the play - along with the other purportedly Shakespearean documents unearthed by Ireland and his father Samuel - had been attacked only a fortnight earlier by the leading Shakespearean editor of the day, Edmond Malone, in An Inquiry into the Authenticity of Certain Miscellaneous Papers and Legal Instruments. Malone's statement of intent makes clear his chosen role as a defender of Shakespeare: It has been said, and I believe truly, that every individual of this country, whose mind has been at all cultivated, feels a pride in being able to boast of our great dramatick poet, Shakspeare, as his countryman:"--Provided by publisher.
個人件名 Shakespeare, William,
生没年等 1564-1616
一般件名細目 Authorship.
一般件名 Authorship.
Drama
資料情報1 『Shakespeare and the idea of Apocrypha : negotiating the boundaries of the dramatic canon /』 Peter Kirwan. Cambridge University Press, 2015. (所蔵館:中央  請求記号:F/932.5/S52/S65  資料コード:7114781603)
URL https://catalog.library.metro.tokyo.lg.jp/winj/opac/switch-detail.do?lang=ja&bibid=1352052384