資料詳細

  • 1 件中、 1 件目

[ 洋図書 ] A companion to free will / ( Blackwell companions to philosophy ; 78 )

edited by Joseph Campbell, Kristin M. Mickelson, and V. Alan White. -- John Wiley & Sons, Inc., -- 2023, --

所蔵

所蔵は 1 件です。

所蔵館 所蔵場所 資料区分 請求記号 資料コード 所蔵状態 資料の利用
配架日 協力貸出 利用状況 返却予定日 資料取扱 予約数 付録注記 備考
中央 3階C 一般洋図書 F/151.2/C73/C 7117178805 配架図 Digital BookShelf
2024/05/22 可能 利用可   0

Eメールによる郵送複写申込みは、「東京都在住」の登録利用者の方が対象です。

    • 統合検索
      都内図書館の所蔵を
      横断検索します。       類似資料 AI Shelf
      この資料に類似した資料を
      AIが紹介します。

ページの先頭へ

資料詳細 閉じる

ISBN 1119210135 (hardcover)
ISBN13桁 9781119210139 (hardcover)
無効なISBN等 9781119210153 (electronic book)
テキストの言語 英語                  
分類：NDC10版 151.2
本タイトル A companion to free will /
著者名 edited by Joseph Campbell, Kristin M. Mickelson, and V. Alan White.
出版地・頒布地 Hoboken, NJ, USA :
出版者・頒布者名 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.,
出版年・頒布年 2023,
数量 xvi, 508 pages :
他の形態的事項 illustrations ;
大きさ 26 cm.
書誌注記 Includes bibliographical references and index.
要約、抄録、注釈等 "The concept of free will is fraught with controversy, as readers of this volume likely know. Philosophers disagree about what free will is, whether we have it, what mitigates or destroys it, and what (if anything) it's good for. Indeed, philosophers even disagree about how to fix the referent of the term 'free will' for purposes of describing and exploring these disagreements (Nichols [28]). What one person considers a reasonably neutral working definition of 'free will' is often considered question-begging or otherwise misguided by another. Such disputes make it difficult to summarize the problem of free will, roughly the debate over the nature and existence of free will, in a clear and uncontentious way. In generic terms, however, the two basic solutions to the problem of free will are free-willism, the view that we (ordinary humans) have free will (Campbell Lota [8]), and free-will denialism, i.e. the view that we do not have free will (Smilansky [12]). As stated here, neither denialism nor free-willism constitutes a complete solution to the problem of free will; to be complete, a proposed solution must also tell us a convincing story about what free will is (what 'free will' means) and that, as it turns out, is a very difficult task indeed. One historically popular way of approaching the problem of free will is to ask about the relationship between free will and determinism: "Does free will stand in relation R to determinism: yes or no?" This is just a template for a question, of course. To transform this template-question into a substantive question with a clear meaning, we need to flesh out the template's free-will relatum, its determinism relatum, and give a precise value to relation R. There is, however, no uncontroversial way to do this. In addition to the standard difficulties raised by fixing the referent of 'free will', philosophers hold radically different views about what is-or should be-meant by 'determinism' (White [2], Vihvelin[1]; see also Beebee and Mele (2004), Shabo (2010)), and they identify relations which are as substantively different as correlation and causation when characterizing relation R (Mickelson [4]). In practical terms, then, it may be best to think of the problem of determinism as a loose collection of disagreements about how to best spell out and answer the template-question, and how (if at all) asking and answering such questions would help us to solve the problem of free will"-- Provided by publisher.
著者標目 Campbell, Joseph Keim, 1958-
Mickelson, Kristin M.
White, V. Alan.
統一タイトル(シリーズ副出標目) Blackwell companions to philosophy.
シリーズ名・巻次 Blackwell companions to philosophy ; 78
一般件名 Free will and determinism.
Libre arbitre et déterminisme.
資料情報1 『A companion to free will /』（Blackwell companions to philosophy ; 78）　edited by Joseph Campbell, Kristin M. Mickelson, and V. Alan White.　John Wiley & Sons, Inc.,　2023, （所蔵館：中央　 請求記号：F/151.2/C73/C　 資料コード：7117178805）
URL https://catalog.library.metro.tokyo.lg.jp/winj/opac/switch-detail.do?lang=ja&bibid=1352063131

ページの先頭へ